Post-Trial Motions

The writers of the MBE like to test on the topic of motions. There are pretrial motions, motions made during trial, and post-trial motions. This post focuses on the latter: motions made after the verdict. 

There are two motions to keep in mind here, and the first is a motion for a new trial. A party must make this motion within 28 days of the judgment. There are a number of reasons why a judge might grant this motion. 

Each of the following is a potential ground:

~ the judge gave an erroneous jury instruction

~ new evidence was discovered that could not have been discovered before with due diligence. 

~ misconduct was committed by a juror, party, lawyer, or etc. 

~ the judgment is against the weight of the evidence 

~ damages are inadequate or excessive (more on this later). 

The second post-trial motion to note is the motion for relief from order of judgement. The grounds for this motion are more demanding and the timeline in which to make the motion is longer. Rather than 28 days, this motion can be made any time if due to a clerical error, and within a reasonable time (up to a year) if due to anything allowable other than a clerical error. 

Specifically, the following grounds are allowable:

~ clerical error

~ mistake, or excusable neglect

~fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by the opposing party

~ newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered with due diligence with enough time to make a motion for a new trial and existed at the time of trial

~ a void judgment 

The next topic does not specifically fall under the category of a motion, but is motion adjacent. Rather than moving for a new trial if damages are inadequate or excessive, the court might suggest remittitur and additur. 

With remittitur, the court offers plaintiff the choice as to whether to reduce the damages decided by the jury or to accept a new trial. Additur is similar to remittitur, but with a twist: the defendant is given the option as to whether to increase the damages award or to accept a new trial. An important distinction here is that although remittitur is allowable in both state and federal court, additur is only allowable in state court. The Seventh Amendment prevents a federal court from recognizing additur.